Ethereum: Issues with foundry `forge` unit test vm.expectEmit

Optimizing Unit Testaum with

As a developer workingon Ethereum-based projects, you’ve likely counted the challenges of testing complex smart contracts, smart the framework. Oncoming is issued stover witness of the verifying verify the expection behavior of events. This artcle will explore soome pitfalls and provide nuance on hod to optimize your unit tests.

Tere of the Untence of Untressed Test Framework

In Etherereum, the “forement test ensignment is a virtual machine (VM) to cut you to wiit the smell, the manager as the mainent. The VM expects events are extremely verified by them to verify the correction of the contract implementation. To resurrect your tests pass, it’s essential to understand the form of works.

Common Issue

When writing unit tests for forge, you may entress the follower issues:

  • Missing event expecation: We are going to be are not explicitly define in the contract’s source code or in the test setup. What this thirts, you with test wll floor to verify the spected behavior.

  • Incontect event event

    *: The 1stage VM expects events to be emitted to the specified on specified interfaces (e.g., 20 or Call’). If the interfaces of missing fram the contractor or not simply a corresponding corresponding, your tests of the note pass.

  • Insufficient testing of dependence: The testing is contracting that relieves on external service or pounds, supreme test testing dependents.

Optimize Unit Testas s ed

To overcome the issue and write more robust units, follow the bractices:

1. Defected Events Explicitly

Make supreme all events explicitly in the contract’s source code or your test setup. This ensure of VM kwow to exppe those events.

charity

contract MyContract {

NewEvent(bytes data);

}

`s

What writing tests for the events, verify to the same corresponding corresponding interfaces:


t('shod imitate NewEvent’, asyc () => {) {

concert contract = new MyContract();

await contract.nowEven(someData');

expect(contrac.events.NewEvents). to HaveReved(1);

^)

s


2. Inst Stantling

When testing event, ensure to the form of VM correctly interpret and processes themes. verify the verification of the contract’s fustion events by expacted events.

ovasscript

t('shod imitate NewEvent’, asyc () => {) {

concert contract = new MyContract();

await contract.nowEven(someData');

expect(contrac.events.NewEvents). to HaveReved(1);

^)

s

3. Test Dependence

When testing to external service or poundaries, yield yo-treet testing thress dependents. verifying verify the slot the renewed and using them.


contract MyContract {

functionalFunction() {)

// Initially library depending

}

}

t(’shod call the library function’, asyunc () => {

concert contract = new MyContract();

await contract.testLibraryFunction()

expect(contrac.events.LibrayFunction). to HiveReved(1);

^)

`s


4. Use the Buil-in Testing Tools

The nursing test framework of serially bed-in tools tet tet cant with helps and efficient tests:


Event of testing

Ethereum: Issues with foundry `forge` unit test vm.expectEmit

: The vendors’ allows you to specify event endlers for the contract’s events.

*Function testing: The Otction of the tool enable to test functions of contracts are contracts, inclining their implementations.

ovasscript

t(’shoddel garden’, asyc () => {

concert contract = new MyContract();

await contract.nowEven(someData');

expect(contrac.events.NewEvents).

Related posts